Category: Opinion

Network planning to attract new passengers

network planning, customers on a bus

The National Bus Strategy (NBS) sets out a vision to improve bus services with the principal aim of encouraging more people to use buses, which means the traditional approach of network planning is going to change.

Previously operators have driven most of the decision making due to buses being largely run on a commercial basis and have had full control in terms of the services they run, which communities they serve, the frequency of services, and the times of day they operate. Now, Local Transport Authorities (LTAs) will have more control over bus services and there will be a bigger push, not only for commercial services, but also economically necessary funded services to meet the needs of local communities.

network planning, customers on a bus

LTAs and operators have a responsibility to work more collaboratively in order to provide an integrated and efficient service for customers. The majority of LTAs have opted for Enhanced Partnerships over Franchising; working closely with operators to improve the network instead of having full control over bus services. Partnerships already operate very successfully, with examples in Nottingham, Brighton, and the West Midlands delivering passenger growth and high levels of customer satisfaction.

LTAs are required to set Bus Service Improvement Plans (BSIPs) which they will then closely monitor in order to receive grant funding. The majority of operators in the region must agree to the BSIPs and ensure that they consistently follow the points laid out in the plan to receive BSOG payments.

Utilising data to improve the network

The NBS is encouraging a more open sharing of data between LTAs and operators and insisting that processes become more transparent, which requires a level of trust from both parties. Previously operators will have only had to share data from contracted services, but now the LTAs require data from commercial services: such as patronage, revenue, and customer feedback.

This shared information can be used to inform the structure of the network. For example, an increase in bus lanes and traffic priority measures will speed up journey times, which means fewer buses are needed to run on that particular route, giving them the opportunity to be utilised elsewhere. This can also lead to a reduction in the cost to run the service, which in turn can be passed on to passengers in the form of lower fares. Faster journey times and lower fares will also help to encourage more people to use the bus.

In order to monitor the progress of BSIPs, LTAs need access to data to see whether or not the goals are being achieved and to see if they have made an improvement to service and patronage levels. These results are also required to be published under the funding terms, which means it is important to get accurate figures.

Software solutions can be implemented to monitor route performance to assess how successful a route is, and customer feedback can be collated and tracked to see where issues may have developed and why. Analysis tools can also be utilised to give a complete picture of the network by collating all the data into one system and offering breakdowns of individual areas. Users are able to view information such as patronage trends that are formulated into graphs and charts. This drill down capability provides intuitive interrogation of the data, investigating the root causes of any identified issues.

Coordinating services to streamline the network

A key point of the NBS is to simplify services for customers so that they feel more encouraged to use buses, whether that’s with multi-operator ticketing which enables the customer to use a variety of buses from different operators, or by implementing a more streamlined service.

The NBS encourages operators to work with LTAs to harmonise route numbers to improve the passenger experience. So instead of having two buses that serve different parts of the city but have the same service number, this would then change to two different numbered buses.

LTAs should plan an integrated transport network whereby other modes of transport, such as trains and trams are coordinated with bus services and arrive and depart at a suitable time so passengers can avoid waiting for long periods. Bus timetables should also be coordinated so different operators do not run buses at the same time, which will stop a duplication of effort and cut down on costs.

As well as streamlining the operational side, operator branding can be replaced with route branding to simplify the service. Software solutions can easily merge different operators’ timetables together and create a customised stop display that incorporates the route’s branding, making it easier for customers to know that they are getting on the right bus.

Improving process efficiencies

In many cases, processes between LTAs and operators are not synchronised and require time-consuming and error-prone manual duplication of data entry. Tools are available for mapping, timetabling, and scheduling, that can gather all the information from operators and consolidate this data into a single, combined view of operated routes which LTAs can then use to produce timetables for the whole network. Operators can then use tools that enable rapid scenario modelling to test for ‘what if’ scenarios and find the best way to service that route.

By using integrated software solutions, LTAs can transfer timetables into contract registers and operators can import the information and work out how to make the service more efficient, such as moving journey times to cut down on costs. They can then feed this information back to LTAs and share ideas without losing data integrity.

Historically this data has been exchanged over paper, pdf, email or excel and this format has had to be rekeyed into the operator’s or LTA’s systems, which is very time consuming and can lead to errors. Ideally, planning data should be shared via TransXChange files which should be used as a standard format across LTAs and operators, regardless of the different systems used. This will allow for a more efficient sharing of data as the operator can then import that file straight into their scheduling system.

How Omnibus can help

With over 30 years’ experience in software and consultancy services, Omnibus provides software and consultancy for passenger transport schedulingstaff rosteringdepot allocation and timetable construction to public transport operators and local authorities, with solutions being used in over 180 sites across the UK and overseas.

When it comes to scheduling, is there too much trust in technology?

Close up of man using laptop

Computers are heavily relied upon for information, but sometimes the answer you want isn’t the one you always get. When it comes to scheduling, spotting when something isn’t quite right is a vital skill.

Can you trust technology? And the biggest question is: Can you trust your operation to be in the hands of technology?

Close up of man using laptop

With over 25 years’ experience providing public transport operators and local authorities with systems that meet their needs, Omnibus is one of the industry leaders in providing passenger transport software, whether that be to timetable, schedule, staff, record, manage and publicise services. 

Omnibus has a range of software solutions to meet any demand within the running of your operation, but it isn’t software that Omnibus discusses with routeone – it was the people who use it. 

Don’t de-skill a trade 

Scheduling is an art and a skill, and one that requires training. Most of all, it requires a scheduler, not just scheduling computer software. 

Transport is more than just a vehicle taking passengers from a to b, as operators will know, there’s hours of planning and organising that goes into running a functioning and successful bus service. 

Peter Crichton, Omnibus MD, says: “We still believe passionately that we need somebody that understands what they’re doing in the job. 

“If you’re the one controlling the computer, you should have a knowledge of what you’re actually controlling – having an understanding of what manual scheduling involves.” 

In a time where technology is evolving at a rapid rate and technological solutions are making tasks simple and easier – even if it means putting someone out of a job – Peter expresses his concerns about the “spin” computer systems get. 

“There’s quite a lot of spin these days about computers being able to do everything, but computers are only controlled by human beings who need to know what they’re controlling. 

“Scheduling is a skill. You don’t de-skill your accountants or your finance managers when you get a new piece of software, so why do people do it for schedulers?” 

Need to understand 

Using a computer system, if one chooses, is acceptable. But as Peter explains, someone will still need to understand what the outcome of the process should be. 

“At the end of the day, the whole thing with computers is, it’s garbage in, garbage out – and you only know whether it’s producing a good result if you know what you’re aiming for in the first place,” he says. 

“I think there is a tendency sometimes to undervalue schedulers, but with a stroke of a pen they can save companies hundreds of thousands of pounds. 

“You only have to input one – even when using a computer – silly parameter and make a meal-break twice as long as it needs to be and then suddenly your duties are costing a lot more,” Peter explains. 

Omnibus isn’t saying to rid the industry of computers, admitting that its computer systems will help just as much as the next, but it’s promoting the need for human control surrounding the job of scheduling. 

Whether a firm chooses to use a computer system or manual, someone will be at the helm inputting data – however, there is a disregard for training those people in control of scheduling. 

No magic box 

“There’s so much praise for how wonderful these computer systems are, and it might be seen as a bit of a luddite approach to be saying ‘oh you need to be trained’, but the only way you can judge something and to benchmark it is to know what it’s supposed to be achieved. 

“I think so many people think there’s a magic box, you just press a button,” Peter says. 

He also explains that while it will produce a result, someone will still need the knowledge to guide it to get that result. 

He adds: “It’s got to have parameters and you’ve got to understand the rules the parameters are there to achieve, what you’re trying to get from those and how to tweak those parameters to get the result you want – it’s not just a case of press a magic button and it’ll all work. 

“Schedulers need to understand what they’re actually doing. This is why we’re saying there is a need for the industry to start training again.” 

Essential training 

Omnibus is running a scheduling training course, which it says is getting enquiries because people are realising they need to have the skills to understand what it is they’re trying to achieve. 

The course is based at Omnibus’ own training rooms in Oldham and lasts for two days. It is open to anyone interested in planning and scheduling and takes place throughout the year. 

The training sessions come after the company decided to takeover Jim Hulme’s schedule training course TransACT. 

Peter says: “Jim wanted to retire, and we decided that this vital course needed to carry on, so we’ve taken over the rights to it.” 

The course gives an insight into how to produce timetables and schedules manually, which might seem counter intuitive for a company that specialises in scheduling software. But by understanding the manual process, it gives an ability to know what answer to anticipate from the computer and becomes easier to spot anomalies, usually caused by restrictive or incorrect parameters. 

Peter adds: “You would never ask someone who didn’t know how to do accounts to run your year-end figures. Likewise, with scheduling, you shouldn’t expect someone with no knowledge of how the process works to get the best from the software.”

This article originally appeared in routeone magazine.

Why do we still bother to schedule buses?

Three Dublin Bus double decker buses on Westmoreland Street, Dublin city centre.

There has been much talk across the bus industry about demand forecasting, dynamic route management and big data.

With all the technology and data now available to operators, why do we still bother to schedule buses?

The simple answer is scheduling your operation in advance will give you the best plan possible for any given day of service.

Three Dublin Bus double decker buses on Westmoreland Street, Dublin city centre.

This is unavoidably as true today as it has been in the past, however, the wealth of data available to us may advise a movement away from the ridged service patterns of the past.

Realistic schedules help financial forecasts

Traditional service patterns, such as ‘school days’, ‘school holidays’, ‘Saturdays’ and ‘Sundays’ are if nothing else, easy to interpret. That means anyone stood by the road on a Wednesday in mid-summer can easily predict that the buses are operating the ‘school holidays’ timetable. The danger of moving towards more complex (though arguably more precise) service patterns is that you may lose a degree of that predictability. 

Regardless of the number of service patterns required and created, the work carried out by a good schedule compiler will always ensure that every journey required, for any given day of service, is resourced in the most efficient and economical way.

The resulting set of schedules are often then used to predict costs and develop financial forecasts, so it is essential that the planned hours, miles and resources determined by these schedules are realistic to lessen the chances of any sudden financial strife for the company. How realistic these schedules are will depend upon how sensitive the data used to create them is to any unpredictable forces that are prevalent in the real world.

As we have mentioned, it is unarguably necessary for your scheduler to create driver duties that are efficient, but they should also be realistic and fair. This should be in recognition that the true costs of driver duties is found in the total paid hours, after the work has happened.

If duties are not realistic then the actual paid hours are likely to increase from the hours planned. Also, if they are not fair then staff retention or absence could start to become an issue.

Communicating with customers

But scheduling isn’t all about the money. Your completed schedules are also required to communicate with the travelling public as to what journeys are available.

Bus companies have a legal obligation to provide information regarding their services, not only to the public, but also to the local authority and the Traffic Commissioners office. This means that the scheduling process must take place in ample time to correctly resource and make any necessary changes to service before declaring the journeys you are going to operate. 

How you communicate any changes to your services is key and should not be seen as a begrudged legal obligation. Also, it should be recognised that how easy it is to communicate any changes to anyone, will depend heavily upon how complex your service patterns may have become in the pursuit of precision. 

Many operators have embraced various technologies to help reach out to their customers; be that through social media or dedicated mobile apps and websites. These technology based methods should not, however, be the only interface you have with your customers or else you risk denying information to those who are less ‘connected’ or who may only travel occasionally.

Power of a customer-focused driver

To reach out to these groups perhaps some clear messages either on or off the buses could be employed, but perhaps most crucially, you should never underestimate the power of a well-informed and customer-focused driver. 

Here again we have an example of how communication is key. Having those who have to deliver any schedule produced engaging with changes, has to be encouraged. If nothing else, getting information on how and why certain parts of an existing schedule may or may not work too well ‘on the road’ is vital. But by giving the workforce as much information in advance of a change will mean that they are able to communicate directly with your customers, armed with the facts and real knowledge. 

So, why do we schedule. Well, in part it is to ensure that we can operate services efficiently and economically and, therefore, control the costs of our operation much more keenly.

Scheduling also helps to ensure that our legal responsibilities as an operator are met. But we also schedule to help our customers by providing service information that is truthful, reliable and can be understood. How we ensure the quality and reliability of this information is through good communication between those who plan the services and those who have to deliver them.

Supporting the industry to Bus Back Better

National Bus Strategy - Bus back better July 2021

The UK Government has launched Bus Back Better, the long-awaited National Bus Strategy for England, and it promises a bright future for the industry.

It sets out an ambitious vision that will revolutionise the way in which local bus services are provided. Operators and local transport authorities will work closely together to create a new environment that will spur on genuine improvements for passengers.

Meanwhile, for areas that choose to press ahead with franchising their local bus services will now have the means and guidance to allow that to happen.

National Bus Strategy - Bus back better July 2021

Article featured in Beginning the Bus Revolution June 2021 by Passenger Transport

Omnibus, one of the UK’s leading passenger transport software businesses, and EPM Bus Solutions will play a key role in making that happen.

Aiden Proctor, for Omnibus said: “The National Bus Strategy talks a lot about redefining EBSR and I think there’s a real drive to improve the quality of the data that can be shared as part of the process. We already have Bus Open Data Service tools and our TransXChange files are comparatively data-rich, so we can really supply local authorities with incredibly high-quality data today. That of course can also be then supplied downstream to all the other data users too.”

Take the hassle out of scheduling 

Empowering you with technology to develop efficient and optimised schedules

Are you ready for Bus Open Data Service (BODS)?

Network Big Data Transfer

The Bus Open Data Service (BODS) provides bus timetable, vehicle location and fares data for every local bus service in England.

The Department for Transport (DfT) wants to make it easier to travel by bus and says the open data will enable passengers to plan their journeys with confidence, spend less time waiting and find the best value tickets.

Aiden Proctor gives a rundown on the intricacies of a BODS timetable file.

Network Big Data Transfer

What is BODS?

The Bus Open Data Service is a scheme led by the Department for Transport (DfT) that requires all bus operators in England to publish timetables, fares and live vehicle tracking in an open data format that can be read by other downstream users. The intention is to provide more data to transport users, improving accessibility but also allowing third party developers access to the data.

What is required?
In regards to timetables, operators are required to supply a TransXChange (TXC) file that is either uploaded and hosted on the DfT site or hosted elsewhere but linked to the DfT site. The DfT wrote a separate list of requirements for the data it wanted to be included in a TXC file for BODS. This is known as the PTI Profile. It is currently on version 1.1A.

Fares and live tracking data is supplied differently and not in the scope of Omnibus.

What is the difference between a file for BODS and a standard TXC file?
The PTI Profile sits within the TXC 2.4 schema – that means the BODS file is laid out and set up in the same way as a normal TXC file but some of the data fields that are optional within a standard TXC 2.4 file are mandatory in a BODS file. The PTI Profile also stipulates the way that some of the data entries must be configured – this may be different to how you would export it as a normal TXC 2.4 file.

So what does that all mean?
It means that producing a standard TXC 2.4 file will not produce a compliant BODS file. That is why Omnibus created a separate BODS Exporter within our TXC Exporter Module.

Why is it separate?
Our standard TXC Exporter is very versatile in the way it allows users to configure the data fields they export in a TXC file. BODS does not have this flexibility – it must contain certain data and in a certain format. Therefore, we created a separate export routine. The BODS Exporter offers no ability for a user to customise their output because the data format is very specific as detailed by the PTI Profile.

What is happening in the real world?
The DfT have set a deadline of 30th September 2021 for all timetable files submitted to BODS to be compliant with the PTI Profile 1.1A. This means that a standard TXC 2.4 file or an invalid BODS format file will no longer be accepted.

Our friendly team is fully versed on BODS requirements and can walk you through the whole process, and continue to support you as requirements evolve. Think of us as your partner and just know that we’ve got your back; all you need to do is get in touch and we’ll be happy to make this process as simple as possible for you.

Can scheduling software replace the scheduler?

Can scheduling software replace the scheduler

Scheduling software has transformed the passenger transport industry, but many experts argue that it takes a mix of skills to achieve the right result.

Scheduling software packages are now well established at any bus operator of any significant scale and they have streamlined and transformed the way in which companies operate their businesses by reducing costs and increasing efficiency. But are these scheduling software packages the solution to all ills?

Can scheduling software replace the scheduler

Bus scheduling is an art and a skill that takes time to learn. Many experienced schedulers would argue that software packages need to be used in tandem with some very human skills; in other words, they are an aid rather than the means to an end. These packages can assist the scheduler in creating schedules that are more resilient, but despite advantages in technology, they still need human experience and talent.

Scheduling entails myriad of specialisms

Graham Atkins, network planner at Bournemouth-based Yellow Buses, joined the world of bus and staff scheduling around 2016. His background is as a bus driver, but he admits he was always interested in the way that his day-to-day duties were scheduled. “I’m also a bit computer savvy and enjoy problem solving, so it was inevitable I’d end up as a scheduler,” he jokes.

Atkins admits it took him around two years to get to grips with the complex process and myriad of specialisms that scheduling entails. “We had the Omnibus [scheduling] software, but we were still using pen and paper back then for so many of the tasks,” he says. “I thought we could do more with the software.”

Omnibus software is not a new product making bold unsubstantiated claims, but one that has been continually updated and refined for decades by industry experts, many of them with a background in scheduling.

The aim is to provide bus operators with a suite of efficient yet powerful tools that is backed by considerable investment and continued improvement by the Omnibus team. This reflects not only rapid changes in technology but also the evolving requirements of the industry as a whole, for example, with the software providing dedicated export feeds including VDV, TransXChange, ESBR and BODS.

Atkins and his colleagues recognised the power of the Omnibus software and the decision was made to embrace its full potential. The software company, says Atkins, were extremely supportive during this transition period.

Scheduling requires human input

“We went to see them and they came to see us and we really got under the skin of it,” he adds. “We thought carefully about what we wanted from the system and we worked closely with them to tailor the suite to what we needed: that has been such a benefit to the business. I can sit at the computer and it generates so many things that are used around the company – ticket machine data, real time information systems, timetables at bus stops and on the website, information for our finance team – all of that flows out of the one system.”

However, Atkins is adamant that a scheduling software solution can only go so far and that human input is also still needed. He says that the art of scheduling is about achieving a fine balance and it requires a real mix of skills, not just careful attention to detail. Atkins points to his background as a bus driver and how his experiences in that role have shaped the way in which he approaches his work as a scheduler.

“You could sit down and use the software to create a set of schedules, but it also needs a human eye to look over them,” he says. “With my driver’s hat on I look at a schedule and think about whether it would appeal to me. I’d say that from the driver’s point of view the scheduler is not the most popular person, so it’s about taking the output from the scheduling system and tweaking it to create something that makes sense for all concerned.”

Akins’s views are echoed by Andy Foster, head of network management at National Express West Midlands. He has over 20 years’ worth of experience of Omnibus software in a variety of roles and he describes the skill of scheduling as “an artful science”.

‘Power off’ test

“Scheduling is about creating a timetable that is attractive to the public but it also needs to be cost effective too,” he says. “So, you could create the most wonderfully efficient schedule using the software alone, but it’s more than likely you’d end up with a timetable with headways that just didn’t make any sense to the customer. I’ve always taken the view that you can only get the best from the software when you have a trained scheduler operating it.”

Foster likens this approach to the ‘power off’ test – in other words, if there was a power cut, could the scheduler resort to manual methods if need be?

He continues: “You could put someone in front of the software with no manual scheduling experience, but they just would not have all the answers. The software is there to aid and assist the scheduler. If you look at some of our most intensive services in Birmingham, you could schedule that manually, but it would take a long time to work something out that the computer can do in seconds. You then use the scheduler’s expertise to fine-tune things. That is how you make significant cost-savings and create schedule that works for all parties.”

Foster says that computer packages more often than not supply the right answers for 90% of any given schedule and it is the final 10% where experience comes into play, fine-tuning the output to create the right answer.

Software tailored to operators’ needs

Atkins has had similar experiences where by “continual tweaking” of a schedule he can create an efficient result that meets the expectations of all parties. He adds that this is in part due to the flexibility offered by Omnibus who have fine-tuned the software to the specific needs of Yellow Buses.

“We have a sister company in Greater Manchester and we do their scheduling here,“ he reveals. “The system has been set up to consider the specific needs of that company. We have also had a bespoke build created for outputs that are in a suitable format for use in our timetable books, so there is flexibility there too. You are not just taking a software package off the shelf and having to work around it; there’s a lot of flexibility. The support has also been excellent too – if we have a problem we have quickly received an answer and help.”

Foster also appreciates this flexibility. He has had experience of scheduling packages in the past that were very much tailored to the needs of other countries, in particular the North American market. He says this created some issues for him. In North America and elsewhere it can be a case of one bus and one driver without the more intricate scheduling found at UK operations.

In-depth knowledge of industry

“The Omnibus system is very much in tune with the UK market,” he says. “It has been created by people who have that in-depth knowledge of the UK and so it’s set up around how you’d schedule things if you didn’t have a computer in front of you. It’s a more logical way of doing things and some of those other systems just don’t manage to get to grips with those issues.”

Atkins also appreciates the way in which the Omnibus suite of products is tailored to the UK market. “We can run ‘what if’ scenarios,” he says. “The power of the software is such that if my manager comes in with a draft timetable, I can give him answers of how many drivers it will take, how many vehicles it will take, how many vehicle kilometres etc, within minutes, even for the most complex of problems.

“Over the summer we worked our way through a number of ‘what if’ scenarios about a planned change and the software gave us virtually instantaneous answers. We’ve really come away from Excel files and pen and paper and that’s been a tremendous benefit for all concerned.”

Omnibus continues to evolve its suite of products to reflect the realities and needs of the passenger transport industry of today. It also aims to make the best even better.

This article was first published in Passenger Transport 2018.

Understanding the art of good bus scheduling

Buses operated by Stagecoach Group plc parked in the bus station in Aberdare town centre.

For some, bus scheduling seems like a dark art that is practiced in shadowy corners of the operator’s head office.

Others may assume that algorithms and AI make all the decisions in the misty reaches of the cloud. But which is it? What do schedulers do and why do they do it? To explain, it is easiest to look at the basics. 

Buses operated by Stagecoach Group plc parked in the bus station in Aberdare town centre.

Building blocks for bus scheduling 

We should all be able to agree with the statement that a scheduler must compile the most cost-effective and operable set of timetables, driver duties and rosters possible. 

Creating efficient duties is good, but operable duties are what is really required. 

A scheduler could ensure that duties pay only the bare minimum and weed out any pay for unproductive time. But that is no good if you lose all the flexibility within the schedule. Is it really efficient to reduce your pay by 15 minutes on paper, only to actually pay two or three hours’ overtime on top? 

Another statement is that a scheduler needs to feed a multitude of downstream systems with data. 

The most basic example of that is informing allocators of the duties that have been planned. However, in a fast-moving world where data is king, it is usually schedulers who provide data in various formats to more and more downstream systems. 

They include ticket machines, real-time information providers, websites and mobile apps, to name but a few. Additionally, the Bus Services Act will soon require more data from every operator – much of which, I am sure, will be administered by the scheduler. 

Controlling costs via clever bus scheduling 

It could be said that a scheduler controls all major cost centres within an operator. 

The scheduler dictates the number of duties a set of timetables requires. That filters through to how many rota lines exist and how many holiday weeks are needed, the number of DCPC days and so on. 

If you have a scheduler who consistently schedules more duties than are required, there will obviously be big knock-on effects. 

Perhaps less obvious is that the scheduler will also dictate the number of vehicles your company runs. The more that are in use, the more engineers, spare parts and land to house them are required. 

It is also worth saying that utilising unsuitable vehicles on certain routes or journeys has the real potential to increase the amount of work your engineers have and the number of vehicles that are needed to meet PVR each morning. 

What actually is a bus scheduler’s job? 

The three points above outline what a scheduler does. However, none of them explain what the scheduler’s job actually is. Put simply, a scheduler’s role is to keep everyone happy. 

That may sound like quite an abstract concept. But when boiled down, the person with responsibility for bus scheduling has the task of keeping the whole business ticking over. That surely works better when everyone is happy. 

A good set of schedules can keep all the below satisfied: 

  • Allocators 
  • Customers
  • Drivers 
  • Engineers 
  • Local authorities 
  • Shareholders 
  • Traffic Commissioners

The skill of schedulers is in successfully balancing the different needs and wants of every stakeholder invested in the company. Too often, schedulers can be pressured into only satisfying one group of people, which ultimately fails. 

An example of that would be trying to keep shareholders happy by reducing paid time and layover time. 

That will decrease costs and should increase profitability (on paper at least). But it can also decrease reliability, causing late or missed journeys. That will turn customers away from the service and ultimately leading to shareholders being unhappy as revenue falls. 

Give schedulers the right tools

There is, however, one person that the scheduler often does not keep happy. That is, of course, the scheduler. 

The responsibility for keeping the scheduler content falls on those who manage the company. They must recognise the enormity of what schedulers are trying to achieve and give them the support they need to do it. 

That can be as simple as giving schedulers the tools they need to do the job. It may include computer aids but what is really needed is some help. 

If you have multiple depots with multiple changes each year then why put all that pressure on one person? 

We should also invest in our schedulers. Keeping everyone happy is a difficult job. Schedulers should be given the time and opportunity to learn their trade. You wouldn’t let a school leaver with no experience do your year-end accounts – so why do it for bus scheduling? 

Operators should respect their schedulers

Schedulers have possibly the hardest job of all: Keeping everyone happy. 

As an industry we should recognise how difficult the job is and give those who do it the credit they deserve. 

We must support those who are in the role by giving schedulers the tools they need and the time to learn their trade. After all, if we keep schedulers happy, they should do the same for everyone else.

The article originally appeared in routeone magazine.

The importance of good bus schedulers

People walk in front of city bus operated by Travel West Midlands

Kieran Proctor leads a discussion on the importance of good bus schedulers and the wider impact they have on an operation.

Good scheduling is not just a benefit for passengers, but it has massive implications throughout an operation, Kieran told CILT’s (Chartered Institute of Logistics and Transport’s) Busmark meeting. 

People walk in front of city bus operated by Travel West Midlands

An important aspect to keep in mind when scheduling is that a cost-effective route is not specifically an operable route. The industry is getting a lot more data driven and it is the schedules that drive this. 

A surprising place to find out whether schedules are being run affectively is social media. Kieran said: “Bus spotters like to tell you why you’ve cocked up. But if you have got that on social media, it gives you somewhere to look when making changes.”

Scheduler’s job

The power bus schedulers have is they control the number of drivers and duties required. They also dictate the number of buses needed. If they schedule more vehicles during the day, then more engineers are going to be required. Kieran said: “The scheduler’s job is to keep everyone happy.”

To keep drivers happy, they need to create sensible duties with reasonable breaks. He said: “It may be more cost effective to have a short break, but it’s not operable. Where they need a single rest day, try to avoid going from a late to an early shift.” 

He suggested educating ourselves on what drivers have to deal with. 

On keeping depot allocators happy, he said: “If you keep them happy you keep the drivers happy. It’s all about flexibility. If you build flexibility into the schedule, you won’t have to knock out trips and it helps them a lot.” 

Making sure drivers are well-scheduled helps engineers. Kieran said: “Tired drivers make mistakes and it’s the engineers that have to pick up the pieces.” 

To conclude, he said: “We ought to recognise scheduling is a skilled job and it needs the right kind of people to do it.” 

This article originally appeared in Bus & Coach Buyer.

Schedulers: get ‘armed with the knowledge’ to schedule

Objects for sketching and of work

Kieran Proctor explains why new schedulers need manual training to understand and learn their trade.

Scheduling is an essential job. It is the art of planning. With effective scheduling, it can minimise costs, increase efficiency and workflow and keep a business moving. Without it, a simple mistake can have a huge negative effect on the running of an operation. 

Objects for sketching and of work

Technology has certainly made a scheduler’s job easier, but anyone joining the industry cannot rely on this alone. How can you be certain that the computer has provided the best answer? This is where our training can help.

Essential training 

There are systems out there to make scheduling easier. Omnibus is one of the industry leaders in providing passenger transport software, whether that be to timetable, schedule, staff, record, manage and publicise services. Its managing director, Peter Crichton, agrees that technology alone is not enough for effective scheduling and says, “there’s no magic button”. 

routeone was invited by Omnibus to take part on its TransACT Manual Scheduling for Local Bus Services course, a two-day intensive course at Omnibus’ Oldham offices. 

It is open to anyone interested in planning and scheduling and takes place throughout the year. 

Kieran Proctor and Paul Wreghitt are the principal trainers, however, it has a larger team of experienced schedulers who are able to deliver the course if either one of them is unavailable. 

Keiran says: “We have both been running the courses since Omnibus took over, initially with Jim Hulme there to guide us but we are now running these ourselves.” 

Mystery of scheduling 

This course has a long history and was originally developed by Jim in the late 1970s. 

Kieran says: “When Jim first entered into scheduling, he encountered a very experienced scheduler who would protect his work by covering it with his arms, and created a feeling of mystery as to how the schedules were actually produced. 

“Jim recognised that this was a very good scheduler, but he just couldn’t explain how he actually did what he did. 

“This made Jim determined to find a way to explain to others exactly how timetables, schedules, duties and rosters are created and having found a way, he ran his first course in 1977.” 

Since then, the course has developed in line with the operating practices of the day, however, despite 40 years passing since its inception, the core lessons and methods outlined have remained true and continue to be relevant today. 

Omnibus took on the running of this course with Jim’s blessing in 2018 and hopes to continue developing and delivering these lessons for the next generation of schedulers entering the industry. 

Kieran adds: “We firmly believe in giving people all the knowledge and tools they require to do their jobs as best as they possibly can, so this course fits perfectly into this ethos.”

Course welcome 

The course covers a broad range of subjects: service specification, timetable design and construction, public timetable, bus scheduling, bus workings, working timetable, running board, duty scheduling, daily duties, duty rostering, duty roster and allocation – all of which are connected to form the scheduling system. 

“It gives the attendees a good idea of what is involved in getting bus services out there onto the roads in the real world,” Kieran says. 

“It would seem easy at first to say that a service should run every 15 minutes between the town and the outskirts, however, certain factors such as peak-time congestion and the availability of both drivers and buses have huge effects, and it is the skill of the scheduler that determines how well these issues are addressed.” 

He explains that also understanding how and why certain things may happen within a network schedule is important throughout all roles within the industry. “I believe this course arms all who attend with the knowledge required to do just that.”  

Omnibus says its TransACT Schedules Training Course is “designed to serve as a good foundation for those who need to create or have a working knowledge of bus timetables and their operational effectiveness”. 

During the training, it introduces the theory of good bus timetabling, including the creation of efficient vehicle workings and the relationship between these two disciplines. 

It also focuses on the creation of cost-effective driver duties and the impact that these can have on the vehicle workings and timetables, before also touching on the production of workable driver rosters. 

It adds: “This is all aimed at arming attendees with the tools required to produce efficient schedules that work for you as the transport provider and, perhaps more importantly, work for your customers too.” 

Says Kieran: “Jim had people on the course say ‘yes, that is exactly what I do’, so the method must be right.” 

routeone’s experience 

We soon discovered that it does not matter whether you’re a new scheduler, never scheduled or just want to brush up on the skill – the course is suitable for everyone with an interest in “the art”. 

Omnibus provides all of the tools needed to complete the course, pen, pencil, ruler, rubber and a booklet with all of the information needed. 

The course provides an in-depth look at manual scheduling, and is hands-on, so you are required to do the work in the book provided. 

Part one/day one of the course looks at timetables and bus scheduling, and part two/day two looks at duty scheduling. 

The maths is fast and the tip given at the beginning, which everyone stuck to was, “always use a pencil” – but the Omnibus team provide all the support needed to help get the right answers. 

No calculators are provided, however, for some trickier of the sums, but exceptions were made to double check the answers. 

You learn some tricks of the trade such as: “Don’t discourage drivers by having days off further apart. If when planning the roster you give a driver, for example, Friday and Sunday off, they may call in sick on the Saturday to get a three-day weekend. Try and give them consecutive days.” 

There’s no denying that this course could have many benefits on an operation, making it more efficient and saving time and money.

This article originally appeared in routeone magazine.